6.2 South Asia: Many South Asias

 

Section 2: Many South Asias

Civilization, Language, Religion, and Social Difference

Learning Objectives

After reading this section, you should be able to:

1. Explain what archaeology reveals, and cannot yet reveal, about the Indus civilization.
2. Describe how migration, interaction, and cultural exchange helped shape South Asian populations.
3. Identify South Asia’s major language families and explain how language can become politically important.
4. Compare the origins and geographical diffusion of the region’s major religious traditions.
5. Distinguish between varna and jati and explain how caste has changed over time.
6. Analyze how gender, class, caste, religion, and location produce different experiences within South Asia.

A Region That Refuses the Singular

There is no single South Asian culture.

There are patterns that cross the region: monsoon agriculture, extended family networks, sacred landscapes, colonial inheritances, cricket matches, films, mobile phones, and foods that travel more easily than passports. Yet each apparent similarity opens into further difference. A language spoken by millions may change from one district to another. A religious tradition may contain philosophies, gods, rituals, and social practices that appear to contradict one another. A person may identify simultaneously with a village, caste, language, religion, profession, nation, and global diaspora.

This is why it is better to speak of many South Asias. The region did not develop as a sealed civilization with a single people and an unchanging culture. It was repeatedly made and remade through migration, trade, religious innovation, political conquest, intermarriage, translation, hierarchy, and resistance. Some traditions have endured for thousands of years, but endurance is not the same as stillness.

South Asia’s history is often described as a sequence of arrivals: early farmers, Indo-Aryan speakers, Persians, Greeks, Central Asians, Muslim merchants and rulers, Europeans, and others. This language can be misleading. People do arrive, but they seldom replace everything that came before. They settle, bargain, marry, borrow words, adopt foods, reinterpret gods, and leave descendants who may no longer consider themselves newcomers. Culture accumulates in layers, but the layers bleed into one another.

The oldest South Asian cities offer an appropriate beginning. We can see what their inhabitants built, but we still cannot read what they wrote.

Cities Before History Could Speak

Around 2600 BCE, large urban centers appeared in the Indus River basin and surrounding regions. This civilization is commonly called the Indus civilization, the Indus Valley civilization, or the Harappan civilization, after Harappa, one of its first major sites to be excavated. Its known territory extended far beyond the immediate Indus Valley, from present-day Pakistan into northwestern and western India.

Harappa and Mohenjo-daro contained straight streets, wells, drainage systems, workshops, storage areas, and buildings made with remarkably standardized bricks. Archaeologists have also discovered carefully calibrated weights, seals carved with animals and symbols, pottery, jewelry, metalwork, and evidence of trade with Mesopotamia and communities around the Arabian Sea. These were not isolated farming villages. They belonged to an extensive urban and commercial world (Fouberg & Moseley, 2017; Kenoyer, 1998).

Mohenjo-daro’s drainage system is especially memorable. Wastewater flowed from some buildings into covered street drains. The arrangement was not modern sanitation in the contemporary sense, but it required planning, labor, maintenance, and shared rules. A drain is an unromantic object, which may be why it is so revealing. Monumental rulers build statues of themselves. Urban societies also reveal their priorities through what they arrange to carry away.

The civilization presents an unusual puzzle. Archaeologists have not found the enormous royal tombs, conquering kings, or monumental palaces associated with Egypt and Mesopotamia. One structure at Mohenjo-daro, called the Great Bath, may have served ritual or civic purposes, but its precise function remains uncertain. It is tempting to conclude that Harappan society was unusually peaceful or equal. The evidence does not permit such confidence. Power may have existed without displaying itself in the architectural forms that archaeologists know how to recognize.

The people of the Indus civilization did leave writing. Short sequences of symbols appear on seals, pottery, tools, and other objects. Yet the script remains undeciphered. Most inscriptions are brief, and no bilingual text comparable to Egypt’s Rosetta Stone has been discovered. We therefore know something of how these people constructed buildings, organized trade, measured goods, and represented animals. We do not know what they called their cities, their rulers, their gods, or themselves.

This is a useful warning about the limits of evidence. Archaeology does not uncover the past whole. It recovers fragments that survived decay, rebuilding, looting, erosion, and accident. A brick wall may endure where a song disappears. A seal may survive while the joke once told about its owner is lost forever.

After about 1900 BCE, the great cities declined. Older explanations sometimes imagined a sudden invasion that destroyed the civilization. Current research instead points toward a long transformation involving changing river systems, weakening monsoon rainfall, shifts in trade, population movement, and the gradual abandonment or reorganization of urban centers. People did not vanish. Many moved toward smaller settlements and different agricultural regions, carrying elements of their material and cultural worlds with them (Possehl, 2002).

Migration Without Racial Mythology

Older textbooks often described a light-skinned “Aryan race” invading South Asia and defeating darker-skinned Dravidian peoples. That account mixed nineteenth-century racial theory with simplified interpretations of language and ancient texts. The word Aryan later acquired a particularly poisonous life in European racial nationalism and Nazism.

It is more accurate to speak of Indo-Aryan language speakers. Indo-Aryan refers to a branch of the Indo-European language family, not to a biological race. Groups associated with Steppe pastoralist ancestry entered South Asia during the second millennium BCE, but they encountered populations already shaped by earlier migrations and mixtures. Genetic, archaeological, and linguistic evidence indicates a complex history involving ancestry connected to ancient Iranian agricultural populations, South Asian hunter-gatherers, Central Asian pastoralists, and other groups. Modern South Asians descend from repeated interactions among populations rather than two pure races meeting in a single invasion (Narasimhan et al., 2019).

The distinction matters because languages, genes, and cultures do not travel in identical packages. A community can adopt a language without most of its ancestry coming from the language’s earlier speakers. Children learn the speech of parents, neighbors, schools, employers, rulers, and religious communities. Languages spread through prestige, migration, trade, intermarriage, administration, and necessity.

This history also warns against imagining contemporary language groups as unchanged descendants of ancient peoples. Tamil is a Dravidian language and Hindi an Indo-Aryan language, but speakers of the two languages are not separate human races. They have been connected by trade, pilgrimage, migration, political rule, military service, film, education, and marriage for centuries.

Culture is inherited, but it is also learned. Human beings are not sealed containers carrying civilizations intact through time. They are more like conversations, with voices entering, disappearing, returning, and sometimes being mistaken for the beginning.

Languages That Carry History

South Asia contains several major language families. Indo-Aryan languages predominate across much of northern India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. They include Hindi, Urdu, Bengali, Punjabi, Marathi, Gujarati, Nepali, Sinhala, Assamese, and many others.

Dravidian languages are concentrated in southern India and portions of central India, although Dravidian-speaking communities also live elsewhere. Major languages include Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam. Tamil has one of the world’s oldest continuously maintained literary traditions.

Austroasiatic languages are spoken by several communities in central and eastern India, including speakers of Santali and Mundari languages. Sino-Tibetan languages, sometimes classified more narrowly into Tibeto-Burman branches, are widespread in Nepal, Bhutan, the Himalayan highlands, and northeastern India.

These families contain hundreds of languages and further varieties that may be called dialects. The distinction between a language and a dialect is not purely linguistic. Political recognition, writing systems, education, literary traditions, and state boundaries all influence which forms of speech receive the dignity of being called languages.

India’s Constitution lists 22 languages in its Eighth Schedule. Hindi is an official language of the Union government, and English continues to be used for many official purposes. Individual states designate their own official languages, sometimes more than one. Contrary to a common claim, India’s Constitution does not designate any language as the country’s single national language (Legislative Department, Government of India, 2026).

The constitutional list does not contain every language spoken in India, nor does it rank the worth of those it includes. Recognition influences examinations, government communication, education, broadcasting, and cultural support. Communities whose languages lack recognition may fear not merely the loss of vocabulary but the disappearance of stories, place-names, ecological knowledge, and ways of classifying the world.

Maps tend to show South Asia as blocks of color: Hindi here, Bengali there, Tamil farther south. Human speech is less obedient. Millions of people are multilingual. Someone may speak one language with grandparents, another in school, another at work, and still another when watching films or using the internet. Languages mingle in markets, train stations, apartment buildings, and migrant neighborhoods.

Hindi, Urdu, and the Politics of Difference

Hindi and Urdu demonstrate how political history can divide what remains, in everyday conversation, a largely shared linguistic continuum. Both developed from related forms of Hindustani. Standard Hindi is generally written in the Devanagari script and draws much of its formal vocabulary from Sanskrit. Standard Urdu uses a modified Persian-Arabic script and draws more formal vocabulary from Persian and Arabic.

Speakers can often understand one another in ordinary conversation, particularly when highly literary vocabulary is avoided. Yet Hindi and Urdu came to represent different political and religious identities during British colonial rule and the nationalist movements that preceded Partition. Their differences are real, but history enlarged and institutionalized them.

A language can therefore be close enough to permit conversation and different enough to carry a border.

Bengali and the Making of Bangladesh

When British India was partitioned in 1947, Pakistan was created in two geographically separated territories. West Pakistan lay west of India, while East Pakistan lay more than 1,000 miles away on the eastern side of the subcontinent. Most people in East Pakistan spoke Bengali, while Pakistan’s central government promoted Urdu as the principal national language.

Students and political activists in East Pakistan protested. On February 21, 1952, police killed demonstrators in Dhaka. The Language Movement became a powerful symbol of Bengali identity and resistance to political and economic domination by West Pakistan. Language did not alone cause Bangladesh’s 1971 war of independence, but it became one of the clearest expressions of the deeper conflict.

UNESCO later established February 21 as International Mother Language Day, an observance initiated by Bangladesh and rooted in the memory of the 1952 movement. A protest over the right to speak Bengali thus became a global commemoration of linguistic diversity (UNESCO, 2026).

English and Unequal Opportunity

English entered South Asia through empire, but independence did not make it disappear. It remains important in universities, courts, government, medicine, science, international business, software, media, and communication among people who do not share another language.

English can be a bridge. An engineer from Tamil Nadu, an administrator from Punjab, and a researcher from Bangladesh may use it to communicate with one another and with the wider world. It can also be a gate. Students attending well-funded English-language schools gain advantages that may be unavailable to students educated in under-resourced regional-language schools.

The language of opportunity is therefore also a language of inequality. English proficiency is often treated as an individual skill, but access to it has a geography. It depends on where someone is born, what school is available, what teachers can be hired, and whether a family can afford tutoring or private education.

A Hearth and Crossroads of Religion

South Asia has been a hearth of religious innovation. Hindu traditions, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism originated within the region. Islam, Christianity, and Zoroastrianism arrived from elsewhere but developed South Asian histories and institutions of their own. Indigenous and local traditions have interacted with all of them.

Religion in South Asia is not merely a system of private belief. It appears in pilgrimage routes, dietary rules, calendars, architecture, music, marriage, clothing, political movements, and ideas about land. A river can be sacred. A mountain can be the dwelling place of a deity. A city can become holy because of events believed to have occurred there centuries earlier.

Yet religious labels can conceal enormous internal diversity. Two people who both identify as Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, Christian, or Sikh may disagree over theology, politics, ritual, caste, gender, and almost everything else. A map needs categories. Human conviction rarely remains inside them.

Hindu Traditions and Sacred Geography

Hinduism has no single founder, central authority, or universally accepted date of origin. The word describes a diverse family of traditions that developed over thousands of years from Vedic practices, local and regional religions, philosophical systems, devotional movements, temple traditions, and household rituals.

The Vedas, composed in Sanskrit, are among the oldest surviving sacred texts associated with Hindu traditions. Later texts include the Upanishads, the Mahabharata, the Ramayana, and the Puranas. These works do not provide one uniform doctrine. They contain hymns, stories, laws, philosophical speculation, genealogies, arguments, and competing visions of the divine.

Many Hindu traditions share ideas such as karma, the consequences associated with actions; dharma, a term that can refer to duty, moral order, right conduct, or the proper way of living; samsara, the cycle of death and rebirth; and moksha, liberation from that cycle. These concepts have never had only one interpretation.

Some Hindus worship Vishnu or one of his manifestations, including Krishna and Rama. Others center devotion on Shiva, the goddess in one of her many forms, or local deities associated with particular villages and landscapes. Some traditions emphasize temple worship and pilgrimage. Others emphasize meditation, philosophical inquiry, family rituals, devotional songs, or service.

The result is not a disorderly collection awaiting standardization. Diversity is one of the tradition’s organizing characteristics.

The Ganges illustrates the geographical reach of religious meaning. For many Hindus, the river is Ganga, a goddess whose waters purify and connect the human world with the sacred. Varanasi attracts pilgrims who come to bathe, pray, worship, cremate the dead, and scatter ashes. Yet not every Hindu follows the same rituals, visits the same places, or understands the river identically. Sacred geography creates connections without erasing difference.

Buddhism and Jainism: Questions About Suffering and Harm

Buddhism and Jainism emerged in northern South Asia during a period of intense intellectual and social change. Their teachers participated in a broader world of wandering ascetics and philosophers who questioned ritual authority, social hierarchy, desire, violence, and rebirth.

Siddhartha Gautama, later known as the Buddha, taught that suffering is connected to craving and attachment and that liberation is possible through ethical conduct, mental discipline, and insight. Buddhism developed monasteries, philosophical schools, devotional traditions, and different interpretations of the path to awakening.

The Mauryan emperor Ashoka supported Buddhism in the third century BCE and helped expand its institutions and geographical reach. Buddhist ideas and communities spread through Sri Lanka, Central Asia, Tibet, Southeast Asia, China, Korea, and Japan. The religion later declined across much of India while remaining influential elsewhere. It is one of history’s striking reversals: a tradition may become less numerous in its birthplace while reshaping a continent (Stanford Program on International and Cross-Cultural Education, n.d.).

Buddhism remains central to Sri Lanka and Bhutan and important in Nepal and the Himalayan regions of India. It is also present through Tibetan refugee communities and through modern movements, including the conversion of Dalits seeking an alternative to caste oppression.

Jain traditions recognize a succession of spiritual teachers called tirthankaras. Mahavira, who lived around the same general period as the Buddha, is the most recent tirthankara in the present cosmic cycle. Jain ethics place extraordinary emphasis on ahimsa, or nonviolence toward living beings. Monastic specialists may take elaborate precautions to avoid harming even small forms of life, while lay Jains often practice vegetarianism and support occupations believed to involve less direct violence.

Jainism has never had the numerical reach of Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, or Christianity, but numbers alone are a poor measure of influence. Jain ideas about nonviolence, self-discipline, and responsibility toward living beings have contributed to South Asian ethical thought far beyond the Jain community itself (Pew Research Center, 2021a).

These traditions remind us that ancient South Asia was not intellectually quiet. People living more than two thousand years ago were asking questions that remain recognizable. What causes suffering? Can desire be mastered? Does social status have moral meaning? How much harm do ordinary actions cause? The age of the questions does not make them obsolete. It makes our continued struggle with them more humbling.

Islam: Trade, Travel, Conquest, and Conversion

Islam reached South Asia through more than one route. Arab merchants had long traded along the western coast of India and Sri Lanka. Muslim commercial communities emerged in port cities through settlement, intermarriage, and connections across the Indian Ocean. These communities existed before the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate or Mughal Empire.

Military conquest and Muslim-ruled states were also important. Turkic, Afghan, Persian, and Central Asian dynasties established political control over parts of the subcontinent. Their courts encouraged Persian literature, architecture, administration, art, and new urban cultures. Section 3 will examine these states more fully.

Conversion to Islam cannot be explained by one cause. Some people converted through contact with merchants or Sufi teachers. Others joined communities connected to new rulers, occupations, land settlement, or trading networks. Some may have sought escape from disadvantaged social positions, although caste-like distinctions persisted among many South Asian Muslims. Conversion could be gradual, partial, family-based, and entangled with local practices.

Sufi shrines became important centers of devotion and pilgrimage. Many attracted both Muslims and non-Muslims. This did not erase religious boundaries, but it demonstrates how lived religion often exceeds the clean categories drawn by later governments and maps.

Today, Pakistan and Bangladesh are Muslim-majority countries, as are the Maldives and Afghanistan. India is Hindu-majority but is also home to one of the world’s largest Muslim populations. Muslims in Kerala, Kashmir, Hyderabad, Bengal, Punjab, Sindh, and the Maldives do not share a single history or culture merely because they share a religion.

Sikhism and the Geography of Equality

Sikhism developed in Punjab beginning with Guru Nanak in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. It arose in a region shaped by Hindu, Muslim, Sufi, and devotional traditions but developed a distinct understanding of God, religious authority, service, equality, and community.

Sikhs recognize a succession of ten human gurus. Authority later passed to the Guru Granth Sahib, the central Sikh scripture, which contains the compositions of Sikh gurus and other devotional figures. The scripture is treated not simply as a book but as the continuing guru of the community.

The tenth guru, Guru Gobind Singh, established the Khalsa in 1699. Initiated Sikhs may observe the Five Ks: uncut hair, a wooden comb, a steel bracelet, a particular form of undergarment, and a ceremonial sword. These practices connect personal identity, discipline, history, and collective responsibility.

The Golden Temple at Amritsar is Sikhism’s most important pilgrimage site. Its architecture and setting are striking, but one of its most revealing institutions is the langar, or communal kitchen. Visitors are offered food without charge and sit together regardless of caste, wealth, or status. Equality is not left as a sentence in a sacred text. It is enacted with metal plates, shared floors, donated vegetables, enormous cooking pots, and the labor of volunteers.

A meal cannot abolish every social hierarchy. It can demonstrate, however, what a different social order is meant to feel like.

Sikhism remains closely associated with Punjab, which was divided between India and Pakistan during Partition. Sikh communities also live throughout India and in substantial diasporas in Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, East Africa, Southeast Asia, and elsewhere. Religious landscapes can retain a homeland while becoming global.

Christianity, Zoroastrianism, and Indigenous Traditions

Christian communities in South India trace their history to the early centuries of Christianity, traditionally connecting their origins to the apostle Thomas. Later Christian communities developed through Portuguese rule, other European colonial powers, missionary work, migration, and local conversion. Christianity is particularly important in parts of Kerala, Goa, northeastern India, Sri Lanka, and among minority communities in Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Zoroastrians migrated from Persia to western India after the expansion of Muslim rule in Iran. In South Asia they became known as Parsis, a term connected to their Persian origins. The community remained relatively small but became especially influential in Mumbai’s commercial, industrial, philanthropic, and cultural life.

Indigenous and local religious traditions are more difficult to place on a simple map. Adivasi communities in India and Indigenous communities across the Himalayan and northeastern borderlands maintain varied relationships with ancestors, spirits, forests, mountains, and local deities. Some people identify primarily with a local tradition. Others identify as Hindu, Christian, Buddhist, or another religion while preserving practices rooted in older community histories.

Official categories may require people to select one religion, but lived identities do not always cooperate. A census box can make a complex spiritual world appear tidier than it is.

India’s most recent completed national census remains the 2011 count, which reported data for Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, other religions and persuasions, and people who did not state a religion. These national totals are useful, but they obscure strong regional concentrations and local mixtures. A country-level map that colors India simply “Hindu” conceals millions of Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and followers of Indigenous traditions (Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India, 2011).

Caste: Hierarchy in Ancient and Modern Forms

Few features of South Asian society are more widely discussed or more often oversimplified than caste.

One source of confusion is the tendency to treat varna and jati as if they were the same thing. Varna refers to a broad idealized division found in some Sanskrit traditions. It describes four ranked categories: Brahmins, associated with priestly and scholarly roles; Kshatriyas, associated with rulers and warriors; Vaishyas, associated with agriculture and commerce; and Shudras, associated with labor and service.

This four-part model was never a complete description of South Asian society. Many people and communities did not fit neatly within it. Actual social life was organized more directly through jatis, thousands of localized, birth-based communities connected to marriage, kinship, occupation, status, and region.

Jati boundaries could be restrictive, but they were not identical everywhere or completely motionless. Communities changed occupations, migrated, adopted new customs, claimed higher rank, formed political alliances, and disputed how they should be classified. Caste was durable without being frozen.

People placed outside or beneath the recognized varna order were historically subjected to practices of untouchability and severe exclusion. Many now use the term Dalit, meaning oppressed or broken, as a political and social identity. Dalits have organized movements, political parties, religious conversions, literary traditions, and campaigns against discrimination.

B. R. Ambedkar, born into a Dalit community, became one of the most important critics of caste and chaired the committee responsible for drafting India’s Constitution. He argued that political democracy could not survive without social democracy. Formal voting rights meant less if people remained bound by inherited hierarchies in education, employment, housing, worship, and marriage.

India’s Constitution prohibits untouchability and permits policies intended to address historical disadvantage. India maintains systems of reservations, a form of affirmative action, for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes in areas including education, government employment, and political representation. These policies have expanded opportunity while remaining intensely debated (Legislative Department, Government of India, 2026).

Colonial rule did not invent caste, but British administrators attempted to classify, count, rank, and standardize it. Census categories and ethnographic surveys sometimes transformed flexible or disputed identities into official facts. Once a government writes an identity into law, it may become more difficult to escape and more useful to organize around politically (Bayly, 1999; Dirks, 2001).

Caste has weakened in some settings and changed in others, but it has not simply disappeared with urbanization, education, or technology. It can influence marriage, elections, housing, social networks, employment, and access to resources. Caste distinctions also exist among some Muslim, Christian, and Sikh communities, although their religious foundations and local forms differ.

Students sometimes imagine that a smartphone must belong to a world beyond caste. Yet matrimonial websites can allow users to filter potential spouses by caste. Political parties can analyze caste composition with digital databases. Social media can enable anti-caste activism while also circulating caste prejudice. Modern technology does not automatically destroy old boundaries. It can give them new instruments.

This makes India’s Census 2027 particularly significant. For the first time since independence, the national census will conduct a broad caste enumeration extending beyond the counts of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Supporters argue that accurate data are necessary to measure inequality and distribute public resources. Critics fear that official counting may harden caste identities and intensify political competition. Both possibilities deserve consideration. Measuring a hierarchy can help expose it, but an official category can also become a durable political object (Press Information Bureau, Government of India, 2025, 2026).

Gender and Uneven Change

It is easy to describe South Asian women only through disadvantage: son preference, dowry demands, early marriage, restricted mobility, violence, and unequal access to education or employment. These are serious realities. Presented alone, however, they reduce hundreds of millions of people to a single category of victims.

Women in South Asia are political leaders, farmers, physicians, teachers, garment workers, engineers, domestic workers, activists, artists, migrants, and business owners. Their experiences differ sharply by class, caste, religion, ethnicity, age, marital status, and geography. A professional woman in Bengaluru, a tea plantation worker in Sri Lanka, a garment worker in Dhaka, and a farmer in rural Nepal do not inhabit one common social world merely because they are women.

The region has made substantial gains in girls’ school enrollment, literacy, health, and survival. Bangladesh, for example, greatly expanded girls’ access to education and women’s participation in the garment industry. Sri Lanka developed high levels of literacy and comparatively strong health outcomes. Women have led governments in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal.

Progress in one area does not guarantee equality in another. A girl may complete school but then face pressure to marry, remain at home, avoid certain occupations, or surrender paid work after having children. Education can expand aspirations faster than labor markets and household expectations change.

Across South Asia, adolescent girls ages 15 to 19 are about three times as likely as boys to be outside education, employment, or training. The pattern points toward a critical transition. Girls may enter school in larger numbers than before but encounter widening restrictions as they approach adulthood (United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF], 2025).

Son preference continues to shape family decisions in parts of the region. Sons may be expected to support parents, inherit property, perform religious obligations, and remain attached to the parental household. Daughters may be viewed as joining another family after marriage and may be associated with dowry expenses. These expectations have contributed to sex-selective abortion and unequal treatment of girls in some areas.

Gender inequality is not produced by “tradition” alone. Contemporary labor markets, housing, transportation, digital access, law enforcement, and public policy also shape what women can do. A family may support a daughter’s education but fear for her safety during a long commute. A woman may own a mobile phone but have less freedom than male relatives to use it privately. Across South Asia, girls and women remain less likely than boys and men to have internet access, creating another layer of inequality in education and employment (UNICEF, 2025).

Afghanistan represents the region’s most extreme current reversal. Since the Taliban returned to power in 2021, girls and women have been barred from secondary and higher education. Afghanistan is now the only country in the world where such exclusion is imposed nationally. By 2025, approximately 2.2 million girls had been prevented from attending school beyond the primary level (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO], 2026).

The contrast within South Asia is therefore enormous. In one place, girls enter universities and technology careers. In another, they are legally excluded from classrooms. Geography does not produce a single path from tradition to modernity. Change advances, stalls, and sometimes reverses.

When Culture Becomes Political

Language, religion, caste, and gender are not merely private characteristics. They organize access to institutions, land, education, employment, marriage, and political power.

A language may begin as the speech used at home. A religion may organize ritual, memory, and moral life. A caste may shape marriage or occupation. Yet when governments count these identities, give them legal status, assign them territories, or claim to rule in their name, culture becomes political geography.

This does not mean that diversity inevitably produces conflict. Multilingual and multireligious communities have coexisted for centuries. People share neighborhoods, workplaces, shrines, schools, musical traditions, and foods. Identities become dangerous when political movements teach people that coexistence is weakness, that neighbors are invaders, or that a nation belongs naturally to only one community.

South Asia’s great ethical traditions have articulated compassion, nonviolence, service, equality, and universal human worth. The same region has preserved caste exclusion, patriarchy, religious nationalism, and communal violence. This is not a uniquely South Asian contradiction. It is a human one. Civilizations are not consistent moral personalities. They contain arguments about what human beings owe one another.

The people of South Asia did not suddenly become different when modern borders appeared. Their differences acquired censuses, electoral districts, armies, and borders. The next section follows that transformation through empire, colonial rule, nationalism, Partition, and the modern state.

Key Terms

Ahimsa: The ethical principle of avoiding harm to living beings, especially central to Jainism and also influential in Hindu and Buddhist traditions.

Caste: A broad term for inherited systems of social identity and hierarchy, especially those organized through varna and jati.

Dalit: A political and social identity adopted by many people from communities historically subjected to untouchability and caste oppression.

Dharma: A concept that may refer to moral order, duty, right conduct, or a proper way of living.

Diaspora: A population dispersed from an ancestral homeland while maintaining connections to it.

Indo-Aryan: A branch of the Indo-European language family spoken across much of northern South Asia.

Jati: A localized, birth-based social community traditionally connected to marriage, occupation, and social status.

Karma: The principle that actions have consequences, including consequences connected to cycles of rebirth in several South Asian religions.

Langar: The communal kitchen associated with Sikh institutions, where food is served without regard to caste or wealth.

Moksha: Liberation from the cycle of death and rebirth in Hindu, Jain, and some related traditions.

Multilingualism: The regular use of more than one language by an individual or community.

Reservation: India’s system of affirmative action intended to increase representation and opportunity for historically disadvantaged social groups.

Sacred geography: A landscape understood through religious meaning, memory, pilgrimage, or connections with divine events and beings.

Samsara: The recurring cycle of birth, death, and rebirth described in several South Asian religious traditions.

Sufi: A term associated with varied mystical and devotional traditions within Islam.

Varna: An idealized four-part model of social classification described in some Hindu texts.

Concept Check

1. What does the Indus script’s undeciphered status prevent historians from knowing?
2. Why is it misleading to describe Indo-Aryans and Dravidians as separate biological races?
3. How can a language spread without a population being genetically replaced?
4. Why are Hindi and Urdu described as both closely related and politically distinct?
5. How did the Bengali Language Movement contribute to the creation of Bangladesh?
6. Why is English both a bridge and a barrier in contemporary South Asia?
7. How did Buddhism become more geographically widespread outside its South Asian birthplace?
8. What does the Sikh institution of langar communicate about equality?
9. What is the difference between varna and jati?
10. How have modern technologies weakened some social boundaries while reproducing others?
11. Why might caste enumeration both challenge and reinforce caste identities?
12. Why is it inaccurate to describe women’s experiences across South Asia through a single narrative?

References

Bayly, S. (1999). Caste, society and politics in India from the eighteenth century to the modern age. Cambridge University Press.

Dirks, N. B. (2001). Castes of mind: Colonialism and the making of modern India. Princeton University Press.

Dundas, P. (2002). The Jains (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Eck, D. L. (2012). India: A sacred geography. Harmony Books.

Flood, G. (1996). An introduction to Hinduism. Cambridge University Press.

Fouberg, E. H., & Moseley, W. G. (2017). Understanding world regional geography (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Kenoyer, J. M. (1998). Ancient cities of the Indus Valley civilization. Oxford University Press.

Legislative Department, Government of India. (2026). The Constitution of India. Ministry of Law and Justice.

Narasimhan, V. M., Patterson, N., Moorjani, P., Rohland, N., Bernardos, R., Mallick, S., Lazaridis, I., Nakatsuka, N., Olalde, I., Lipson, M., Kim, A. M., Olivieri, L. M., Coppa, A., Vidale, M., Mallory, J., Moiseyev, V., Kitov, E., Monge, J., Adamski, N., . . . Reich, D. (2019). The formation of human populations in South and Central Asia. Science, 365(6457), eaat7487. doi:10.1126/science.aat7487

Nesbitt, E. (2016). Sikhism: A very short introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. (2011). C-01: Population by religious community, India. Government of India.

Pew Research Center. (2021a, August 17). Six facts about Jains in India.

Pew Research Center. (2021b). Religion in India: Tolerance and segregation.

Possehl, G. L. (2002). The Indus civilization: A contemporary perspective. AltaMira Press.

Press Information Bureau, Government of India. (2025, June 4). Population Census 2027 to be conducted in two phases along with enumeration of castes.

Press Information Bureau, Government of India. (2026). Census 2027: India’s first digital enumeration exercise.

Stanford Program on International and Cross-Cultural Education. (n.d.). Introduction to Buddhism. Stanford University.

United Nations Children’s Fund. (2025). Girl goals: What has changed for girls? Adolescent girls’ rights over 30 years.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2026a). Banned from education: A review of the right to education in Afghanistan.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2026b). International Mother Language Day.